Download the paper:
Abstract:
The accurate specification of modeling and observational error
information required by data assimilation algorithms is a major
obstacle to the successful application of a land surface data
assimilation system.
The source and statistical structure of these errors are often unknown and
poor assumptions concerning the relative magnitude of modeling and
observation uncertainty degrade the quality of land data assimilation products.
In theory, adaptive filtering approaches are capable of estimating model and
observation error covariance information during the on-line cycling of a data
assimilation system. To date, however, these approaches have not been widely
applied to land surface models. Here, we implement and compare four
separate adaptive filtering schemes in a data assimilation system designed to
ingest remotely-sensed surface soil moisture retrievals. Upon testing of each
scheme via a synthetic twin data assimilation experiment, three of the four
adaptive approaches are found to provide substantially improved soil
moisture estimates. However, the specific model and observation characteristics
of satellite-based surface soil moisture retrievals contribute
to the relatively
slow convergence of all schemes. Overall, results highlight the need to
consider unique aspects of the land data assimilation problem when designing
and/or evaluating the relative performance of adaptive filtering algorithms.