Reichle, R. H., and M. G. Bosilovich:
"Issues regarding the assimilation of satellite retrievals of land surface temperature into land surface models"
Presentation at the International Workshop on the Retrieval and Use of Land Surface Temperature, Asheville, NC, USA, 2008.

Abstract:
Satellite retrievals of land surface temperature (LST) are available from a variety of polar orbiting and geostationary platforms. Assimilating such LST retrievals into a land surface model (that is either driven by observed meteorological forcing data or coupled to an atmospheric model) should improve estimates of land surface conditions. However, LST data from retrievals and models typically exhibit very different climatologies for a variety of reasons. For example, LST modeling is fraught with numerical stability problems, because the heat capacity associated with LST is very small. This requires land modelers to approximate the heat capacity as zero, or else be limited to a surface temperature prognostic variable that represents several centimeters of soil. LST retrievals from satellite, on the other hand, are strongly affected by the look-angle, a problem that is particularly acute with geostationary satellites. Moreover, satellites observe a radiometric temperature that is difficult to compare to the model's LST because the emissivity of the land surface is not well known. Finally, LST retrievals from different satellite platforms already exhibit different climatologies due to different sensor characteristics.

In this paper, we present an overview of the challenges facing LST assimilation and point out possible solutions. One such solution is a scaling approach whereby the LST retrievals from each sensor are scaled to the model's LST climatology before they are assimilated into the land model. After assimilation, the merged LST product may be scaled back into the climatology of the LST retrievals if the application calls for it. Because of the strong seasonal and diurnal cycle of LST, scaling parameters must be derived separately for each 3-hour interval and for each month. Another possible solution is to estimate diurnally varying model bias parameters. This approach may be more appropriate as long as the satellite climatology of the LST retrievals is homogenenous across all the sensors that are utilized.


Home

NASA-GSFC / GMAO / Rolf Reichle