An under-appreciated aspect of ocean data assimilation is the
assembly of the input data stream with appropriate quality control and with estimates of the observational errors.
These issues have come to the forefront as preparations are made for GODAE, yet there are no plans in place for
QC of the historical data stream for climate applications. ODASI consortium members currently use 3 different
databases with 3 different QC implementations. Under this collaboration we will use a consensus QC’d in situ
database that borrows from all 3 implementations. In addition, we will participate in GODAE-sponsored QC
activities, especially testing real-time algorithms developed at FNMOC that include reliability statistics.
In most ocean data assimilation implementations today, observation errors are assumed to result primarily from
instrument error and are specified to be white in space and time. The level of variance is tuned with the forecast
error variance to give the best results. In fact, the level of variance and the covariances should depend on the
context for the product, i.e., the state of the ocean consistent with the particular model or application. The
consortium is focused on seasonal-to-interannual time scales, so the data representation error covariances are
expected to be different from those for a high resolution mesoscale application. Investigation of data representation
errors requires analysis of historical data in a modeling context. If there are any examples of these analyses,
they are very few. We will start to explore this issue with the TAO and TOPEX observations and with experiments
to explore the sensitivity of assimilation products to various assumptions made for the observation errors.
|